Posts for: #Politics

A ceasefire is not enough: a radical insistence on decolonization

Israel and Hamas have signed a ceasefire: “we” finally have what we have been chanting for.

So what now? Business as usual? Move on with our lives?

Many people are eager to do so, and many are already doing so.

But this is unacceptable.

So what do we do?

The miserable truth is that the worst kinds of injustice can often not be undone: we cannot raise 100,000 Palestinians back from the death.

What is capitalism and how to step out of it

This post is part of a series about the alleged return of feudalism with the advent of Big Tech.


What is capitalism? What words, ideas and/or concepts would you generally associate with it?

Some might say it is all about “technological development” driven by the “desire to be rich”. Others might say something like “greed” and the “naked pursuit of power”.

But greed, lust for power and even technological development have been around for much longer than capitalism.

If we can’t get our act together digitally, we won’t have our act together anywhere: reason 1

This post originally appeared on the website of OpenTech(AUC).


Imagine you’re at a house party, and people are getting drunk. Slowly but steadily, they are raising their voice. And as more and more people do, you are going to have to raise your voice as well. At the end of the night, everyone is screaming in each others’ ears, without being any more audible than when everyone was talking at a normal volume.

Antizionism and antisemitism

When our governments insist with all their propaganda tools that speaking out against Israel is antisemitic - conflating antizionism with antisemitism - we can’t be surprised that some angry teens in Amsterdam - furious about an ongoing genocide - make the same (stupid and dangerous) mistake.

Fighting the latter, implies fighting the former.

Whatsapp is a bad deal

This blog post first appeared in February 2024 on the website of OpenTech(AUC).

Whatsapp is a bad deal

Normally, when you feel you’re getting the short end of a stick, for example when the supermarket sells you expensive mushy cauliflowers, or when the organization you volunteer at treats you disrespectfully, you go and find what you need somewhere else.

This ability to “defect” to an alternative when you feel you’re not getting a good deal, is an important “power” that helps you get reasonable deals.1

Quantum coherence and Zionism

Meeting yourself

Warning: This post contains some spoilers about the movie “Coherence”.

Imagine that, right now, through the door that is closest to you, someone walks in, and it is… you. A complete, full, physical double of yourself. This other you is as perplexed as you: similarly shocked to find a complete, full, physical double of itself.

If you think this would merely be interesting and cool you probably have not seen the movie “Coherence”.

Sartre: Antisemite and Jew

Intro and disclaimer

I read this book with some friends. Someone had recommended it, and we felt that it was an appropriate time to reflect on what antisemitism has meant in the past, to better understand what it means in the present.

At the start I was a bit sceptical about this contemporary relevance: after all, a lot has happened since Sartre wrote this book (written in 1944, published in 1946). For example, to just mention something, the founding of the state Israel (in 1948). But after reading the book, I was surprised how helpful some of the arguments still are (at least to me).

Masha Gessen, antisemitism and tokenization

Today I was accused of “tokenization” in sharing this powerful essay by Masha Gessen on Mastodon (see the reactions under this post). Because of the character limit of a Mastodon post (at least on my server), I decided to turn my response into a little blog post.

In short, the principle that I was accused of violating looks like this: as an outsider to a community, I should not share/boost the view of a minority of that community, when that view disqualifies the concerns that are held by the majority of that community.

Geert Wilders en klimaatverandering

Laat duidelijk zijn waar 1/4e van de Nederlandse kiezer voor gekozen heeft. Vandaag, in deze korte post, een greep uit de klimaatpunten uit het verkiezingsprogramma 2023 van de PVV (hier te downloaden):

  • Geen miljardenuitgaven meer aan links-liberaal ideologisch beleid als stikstof en klimaat.
  • Terugtrekken uit het VN-Klimaatakkoord; Klimaatwet intrekken.
  • Het klimaat verandert altijd, al eeuwenlang. Bij veranderende omstandigheden passen we ons aan. Dat doen we door verstandig waterbeheer, door het verhogen van de dijken wanneer dat nodig is en door ruimte voor de rivier. Maar we stoppen met de hysterische reductie van CO2, waarmee we als klein landje ten onrechte denken het klimaat te kunnen “redden”.
  • De Klimaatwet, het Klimaatakkoord en alle andere klimaatmaatregelen gaan direct door de shredder. Geen miljardenverspilling aan zinloze klimaathobby’s, maar meer geld voor onze mensen.
  • De NPO is van het padje af: NPO66. In plaats van eerlijke informatie en ontspanning is het vooral bezig met propaganda. We worden dagelijks getreiterd met klimaatpaniek en diversiteitspropaganda. De financiering wordt dan ook geheel beëindigd.
  • Gemeenten werken niet mee aan gender-maatregelen, klimaatwaanzin en diversiteitsgeneuzel
  • Wij constateren in de scholen een toename van politieke indoctrinatie. Schoolkinderen worden geïndoctrineerd met klimaatactivisme, genderwaanzin en met een gevoel van schaamte over de geschiedenis van ons land. Wij willen onderwijs dat vrij is van politiek activisme. Wij willen politiek neutrale leraren voor de klas en politiek neutrale leerboeken in de klas.

Please help yourself

The current international order is like:

Put your own oxygen mask on first, order a glass of wine, purchase something shiny from the duty free shop, watch your favourite movie, take a little nap, before assisting others.

Mastodon post